Can you monetize Captions (by Mirage)’s free tier?

Reproduce it yourself: each factor's risk points = weight × level ÷ 4 (an unclear factor counts as half its weight). The seven add up to 24. Every scored factor quotes Captions (by Mirage)’s own current terms, pricing or help page.

1. Commercial-use rights

   Level 0/40 / 28 pts

   Does the license actually permit monetizing the free-tier output (monetized video / paid client deliverable)? The single most decisive factor.

   “As between the parties, you own all rights in and to your Input and Output, subject to Mirage and its licensors' rights in the Mirage Content contained in the Output.”

   Current Terms (effective Sept 4, 2025; captions.ai/legal/terms canonically redirects here) grant unconditional ownership of your Output with NO personal-use-only restriction and NO subscription condition on commercial use of your output. The AUP contains no commercial-use bar; the only commercial restriction (Service Rules 3.1.xiv) is on reselling the Services / Mirage Content, not your own Output. The older 'AI Creators Terms' line tying commercial use of User Videos to 'the necessary subscription' was folded into the main Terms as of March 1 2025 and is superseded by this unconditional grant. So a free-tier creator can legally monetize the (basic) video they own. Primary-confirmed → L0.

2. Free-plan monetization gate

   Level 3/413.5 / 18 pts

   Free-tier blockers that make output unusable even when commercial use is allowed: watermark, 'personal-only' wording, publish-barring caps.

   “Captions’ free tier applies a watermark to exported video, removable only on a paid plan (per Captions’ Help Center “Watermark on Exported Video”).”

   Captions’ own Help Center documents a watermark on exported video on the free tier, removable only by upgrading to a paid plan. A visible brand watermark on every free export => L3 (corrected from the prior L1, which under-rated the free-tier blocker).

3. Output ownership & sublicensing

   Level 1/44 / 16 pts

   Do you own (or get a clean, transferable, sublicensable license to) the output? Decisive for agency/client work where rights must be handed over.

   “You hereby grant Mirage a limited, nonexclusive, royalty-free, sublicensable license in your Input and Output to: host, cache, store, reproduce, transmit, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute and use your Input and Output to provide the Services, to improve the Services, and to develop new services and products.”

   You own your Output (2.2), but Mirage takes a broad, sublicensable license in your Input/Output that survives termination ('The license set forth in this Section 2.2 shall survive any termination of these Terms'), and 2.1 grants you only a non-transferable, non-sublicensable license to the Services. The grant to Mirage is scoped to operating/improving/developing the Services rather than monetizing your content standalone (it even carves out: 'we will not commercialize your voice on a standalone basis without your written permission'). Standard perpetual operating license that does not strip your ownership → L1.

4. Attribution / branding obligation

   Level 0/40 / 12 pts

   Must you credit the tool, keep a logo, or disclose it by name? An enforceable monetization burden even when commercial use is allowed.

   “As between the parties, you own all rights in and to your Input and Output, subject to Mirage and its licensors' rights in the Mirage Content contained in the Output.”

   No attribution or credit requirement appears anywhere in the Terms or AUP. Free basic exports carry no watermark on their available features. No 'made with Captions' obligation imposed on the user's published video. L0.

5. Copyright & training-data exposure

   Level 1/43 / 12 pts

   Risk the output infringes third-party rights or triggers a platform claim: training-data provenance, indemnity, likeness/voice-clone consent, YouTube synthetic-content exposure.

   “You may not use the Services: ... to misrepresent the provenance of generated content by claiming it was created solely by a human, or otherwise in order to deceive”

   The FREE tier is basic editing of the creator's OWN uploaded footage (no AI generation models are available on Free per the Subscriptions page — every Gen-AI image/video/voice model is marked ❌ for Free). So free-tier copyright exposure is standard: you edit your own clips and add captions. The AUP's no-deceptive-provenance clause maps to ordinary AI/synthetic-content handling and YouTube disclosure, which does not itself cut monetization. Standard generative/editing risk → L1. (On paid tiers that unlock AI generation and realistic avatars this would rise toward L2.)

6. Terms stability

   Level 1/42 / 8 pts

   How likely are today's rights to be quietly changed or revoked tomorrow? Modification clause, retroactivity, notice, and observed change history. The factor the ToS-monitor sells against.

   “If the changes include material changes that affect your rights or obligations, we will notify you of the changes by reasonable means, which could include notification through the Services or via email.”

   Mirage reserves the right to change the Terms at its discretion but commits to notifying users of material changes by reasonable means (Services notice or email). That is a standard unilateral-update clause WITH notice for material changes, not a no-notice or retroactive regime. L1.

7. Creator practicality

   Level 1/41.5 / 6 pts

   The gap between 'technically licensed' and 'actually usable safely': terms clarity/findability, login-gated pricing, credit-model traps. Modulates, never decides.

   “*All prices displayed in USD. Features and prices reflect iOS plans only.”

   Terms, AUP and pricing are all public plain pages (no login wall), and the Subscriptions help page lists exact prices/credits. Minor friction: the public pricing page only shows iOS prices ('Features and prices reflect iOS plans only'), Android has a separate Lite plan, the free tier's allowance is a vague '60-200 lifetime credits' range, and commercial-use language was reorganized (AI Creators Terms folded into the main Terms in 2025). A rights/platform split that takes a little digging → L1, not opaque/contradictory.

ClipJury's monetization-risk verdicts are an editorial read of each tool's own current public terms and pricing as of the last-checked date — not legal advice. Terms change; always confirm against the linked sources before relying on any tool for monetized or paid client work. How we score risk →