For creators & agencies
We read the terms so you don’t get demonetized
You already know the free tiers are traps — that’s why you pay. But paying isn’t the same as being safe. Plenty of paid “pro” tiers still stamp a watermark on every export, or grant a license you can’t legally hand to a client. People upgrade, assume they’re covered, and find out otherwise after a strike or a clawback.
We verify the tools you already pay for actually protect you — every plan checked on the same 7-factor rubric behind our public scores, each verdict tied to a verbatim quote from the tool’s own terms — and we tell you exactly where you’re still exposed and the cheapest way to close it. 50 tools already mapped; your paid stack, verified for your situation.
Two ways to get certain
Paid-stack safety audit
“I'm paying for these tools — am I actually safe?”
$499one-time · your whole stack
A creator already paying for a stack of AI tools, who wants to be sure that money is actually buying safety — not just assuming it is.
- Confirmation that the paid plan you're on actually grants what you think — full commercial use, no watermark, output you own. (Plenty of 'pro' tiers quietly fail at least one.)
- The expensive trap caught: paying for the wrong tier, or paying for protection you're not actually getting.
- Which of your already-published videos could still take a strike — flagged by urgency, each with the exact fix.
- The cheapest paid setup that makes your whole stack genuinely safe — so you stop overpaying and stop risking it at the same time.
- A written report with the verbatim terms behind every call — proof you can show YouTube or a client if challenged.
5-day turnaround
Request this audit →Agency & studio audit
“Is every paid plan in my operation really protecting me and my clients?”
$1,499one-time · monthly retainer optional
An agency or studio shipping AI content to paying clients, where one wrong paid tier becomes the client's problem and yours.
- Every paid plan across your operation verified to actually deliver the commercial rights and ownership you pass on to clients.
- Client-ready rights certificates for your deliverables, so your contracts and hand-offs hold up if challenged.
- The tier-traps caught before they become a client's problem — and yours.
- A prioritized fix plan: what to change first to kill the biggest exposure for the least cost.
- Your stack added to our terms-change watchlist — when we log an adverse change to a tool you use, we flag it to you. Optional ongoing retainer ($1,499/mo); just mention it when we scope your audit.
Custom scope · 7–10 days
Request this audit →Why this verdict holds up
Most “is this safe?” answers are someone’s opinion. Ours is a number you can reproduce. Every tool is scored on seven weighted factors — commercial-use rights, free-tier gates, ownership, attribution, copyright exposure, terms stability, and practicality — each one tied to a verbatim quote from the tool’s own current terms, pricing or help page.
The weights are published, the math is weight × level ÷ 4, and the factors add up to the score. If a platform or a client ever challenges your rights, you don’t argue — you show the evidence trail. And when a decisive clause can’t be confirmed from a primary source, we say so rather than guess.
See the method in the open: the public CMR risk index and how we score it. The audit is that engine, pointed at your stack.
Start with your stack
Tell us the tools you use and what you’re building. We’ll confirm which audit fits, the scope, and the price — then send a secure payment link. No charge before we both agree on what’s included.
- Independent — we don’t take money from the tools we score.
- Source-cited — every verdict shows its receipts.
- Honest — “unclear” is a valid answer when the terms don’t say.
No payment now. We confirm we can help and agree the scope first, then send a secure payment link.
Questions
- I already pay for my tools — why would I need this?
- Because paying isn't the same as being protected. Plenty of paid 'pro' tiers still stamp a watermark on every export, or grant a license you can't legally hand to a client. People upgrade, assume they're safe, and find out otherwise after a strike or a clawback. The audit confirms the money you're already spending is actually buying you the commercial rights, clean export and ownership you think it is — and flags the exact tier that does, if it isn't.
- How is this different from your free reviews?
- The free reviews name the cheapest safe plan for a tool in general. The audit verifies YOUR actual setup — the specific paid tiers you're on, the way you use them, and the content you've already published — and tells you where you're still exposed. It's the difference between a generic spec sheet and a verdict written for your situation.
- What do I actually receive?
- A written report with every claim tied to a verbatim quote from the tool's own current terms, pricing or help page — the same primary-source standard as our public CMR scores. You can read it at your own pace and ask follow-up questions; you can also hand the evidence trail to a platform or client if your rights are ever challenged.
- Is this legal advice?
- No. It's an expert editorial read of each tool's own current public terms as of the audit date, built to be reproducible and source-cited — not a substitute for a lawyer. For high-stakes contracts, take our evidence to your counsel; it makes their job faster.
- What if a tool changes its terms after the audit?
- Every verdict is stamped with the date it was checked, and we tell you the clause most likely to change against you. Our public terms-change log tracks the tools we monitor, so you'll usually see it coming — and you can re-run a check any time a tool you depend on updates its terms.
- How do I pay?
- Tell us your stack first. We confirm we can help and agree the scope, then send a secure payment link — you're never charged before we both agree on what's included.